<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sons Of Simmons &#187; Clay Buchholz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sonsofsimmons.com/tag/clay-buchholz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sonsofsimmons.com</link>
	<description>Rumors involving Boston Sports, Celebrity Gossip, and Humor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Red Sox Still Unwilling To Move Clay Buchholz</title>
		<link>http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/red-sox-still-unwilling-to-move-clay-buchholz/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/red-sox-still-unwilling-to-move-clay-buchholz/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Buchholz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonsofsimmons.com/?p=7278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
From Ken Rosenthal:
The Red Sox&#8217;s willingness to trade right-hander Clay Buchholz for Rangers catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia does not figure to be any greater now that the team has signed free-agent right-hander John Smoltz.
Buchholz remains an important part of the Sox&#8217;s future, and the value that club officials sign to him should not change due to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7279" title="1209277726" src="http://sonsofsimmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1209277726.jpg" alt="1209277726 Red Sox Still Unwilling To Move Clay Buchholz" width="410" height="280" /></p>
<p>From <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/9044030/Trading-Fielder-could-help-Brewers-acquire-pitching">Ken Rosenthal</a>:</p>
<p>The Red Sox&#8217;s willingness to trade right-hander Clay Buchholz for Rangers catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia does not figure to be any greater now that the team has signed free-agent right-hander John Smoltz.</p>
<p>Buchholz remains an important part of the Sox&#8217;s future, and the value that club officials sign to him should not change due to the addition of a 41-year-old veteran coming off major shoulder surgery.</p>
<p>Smoltz, Brad Penny and Tim Wakefield are signed only for next season. Penny also had health issues last season. And Josh Beckett is a free agent after 2010.</p>
<p>The Red Sox, rival executives say, are more open to trading Michael Bowden and Class AA reliever Daniel Bard in a package for Saltalamacchia. Bard, the team&#8217;s No. 1 pick in 2006, is coming off a big season and might be at peak value.</p>
<p>&#8220;They&#8217;re doing everything they can to trade him,&#8221; one rival executive says.</p>
<p>The Sox and Rangers have not spoken since the winter meetings in early December.</p>
<p><a href="http://rangersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/01/boston-to-sign-smoltz-rotation-now-nine.html">Mike Hindman of the Dallas Morning News </a>has a good idea:</p>
<p>The prevailing thought has long been that Texas wants the Nederland, Texas native Buchholz (<span style="color: #29375a;">Nolan Ryan let it slip that he thought Buchholz would look good in a Rangers uniform</span>) and Boston wants the Carrollton native Taylor Teagarden. </p>
<p>Both Texas and Boston have given indication that those players are not available.  My guess &#8212; and it&#8217;s just a guess &#8212; is that Jon Daniels and Theo Epstein are quibbling over what extra piece(s) Texas would have to add to Jarrod Saltalamacchia in order to get Buchholz. </p>
<p>How this all plays out for Texas may depend on what happens with veteran catcher Jason Varitek.    If Boston can land him on a two year deal, I suspect that they will pull back, limp along with the declining leader for another couple of years and then pounce on Minnesota catcher Joe Mauer when he becomes a free agent after the 2010 season.</p>
<h3  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</h3><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://sonsofsimmons.com/red-sox/this-is-why-gammons-is-the-best/2009/" title="This is why Gammons is the Best">This is why Gammons is the Best</a></li><li><a href="http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/red-sox-catching-situation-day-95/2009/" title="Red Sox Catching Situation: Day 95">Red Sox Catching Situation: Day 95</a></li><li><a href="http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/theos-got-a-plan/2009/" title="Theo&#8217;s Got A Plan">Theo&#8217;s Got A Plan</a></li><li><a href="http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/espn-is-desperately-trying-to-get-barry-bonds-airtime/2009/" title="ESPN Is Desperately Trying To Get Barry Bonds Facetime ">ESPN Is Desperately Trying To Get Barry Bonds Facetime </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sonsofsimmons.com/mlb/red-sox-still-unwilling-to-move-clay-buchholz/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
